![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 452
|
Two questions for the pros:
__________________
If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base. Dave Barry |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,012
|
There are lots of ways to define the start of preproduction. If they're not spelled out in your contract, you'll have to argue for one of them.
They could be anything from "green light" to "hiring of a DP, 1st AD or production designer" to "hiring of a director" to "commencement of scouting." Hopefully something *is* spelled out in your contract. Your second question is something we all struggle with at every level. Rewrite, unfortunately, covers just about everything, from a week of work to two months of work. Rewrites can be extensive. Generally speaking, I don't penalize people for giving me little stuff... I sort of think of it like a tank of gas. I'm promising them a decent amount of work for the rewrite, so I play it by ear, and after a while, I have my reps say, "Okay, that's been four weeks of work, we kind of need to say the rewrite is bought and paid for, and move on to the polish." The other way of going is to say, "Hey, we have these steps built in, but the production is sort of using my writer like he's on an all-services deal, which is fine, but let's dump these steps and negotiate an all-services, so we don't have to sit here and watch the clock... not good for my guy, not good for you guys either if that's the arrangement." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 123
|
I have to say, I am slightly baffled by the "primary payment at pre-production" thing. I can see why you're confused.
A 3 step deal (draft, re-write, polish) with a bonus if the script goes into production is standard. But what you are describing sounds almost like a spec assignment, with payment involved IF the project reaches the next step. In terms of what that next step is, I would say... pre-production is when financing is secured, and the main elements (lead, director, producer) are attached. Regarding re-writes and polishes... I agree with Craig- it's sort of up to you. Bottom line: if you really, really love a project and it takes you a bit more to get to the promised land, that's just life. We're obviously working in a murky, unpredictable realm- and it is as unpredictable to us as it is to those hiring. So a nice bit of mutual respect is crucial. I think it's really important to keep in touch with the producers or execs, giving them a super detailed outline, explaining the tone of the picture, bringing up some awesome touchstone movies (this one is v. helpful) You want people to know what you are delivering before you deliver it- you can't give them E.T. if they were expecting Alien. Generally though: a re-write can be pretty massive, incorporating structural changes, character, plotting, basically everything. That's completely up to them. A polish, on the other hand, usually deals with dialogue, settings, adding or deleting scenes, etc. Just make sure you love the project enough to do work that you are not getting paid for. Hope this helps! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,044
|
Quote:
A lot of writers struggle with and argue over what constitutes a rewrite. The official WGA definition of a rewrite is, "significant changes in plot, story line, or interrelationship of characters in a screenplay." A polish is defined as, "writing of changes in dialogue, narration or action, but not including a rewrite." Many heated conversations are had over what constitutes "significant" changes... but those are basic guidelines you can use to determine (or argue) whether you're being asked to do a rewrite or a polish. With regards to the first part of your question, pre-production can be a tricky thing to define as there are often no hard start dates like there are with principal photography. As Craig said, you're probably going to have to argue your point, but you've got a pretty good case that they've started pre-production if any of the following have occurred:
A good rule of thumb is that if the production has been funded and is spending money, they're in pre-production. Up until that point, it can still be argued that they're in the "development" phase of the project. But if they're ramping up to shoot, sending people to scout, commencing official steps in other people's contracts, and the production has started paying for these things... you've got a pretty good argument that they're in pre-production. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,291
|
A number of producers/prodcos define pre-production as commencing when the Line Producer starts work and I know of some who use the day the director's contract begins. But as others have said it can be different things for different people so make sure the contract defines the beginning of pre-production.
__________________
"Why procrastinate today, when you could put it off until tomorrow?" |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|