Is anyone else stoked about this? I think it looks pretty badass. And honestly, a very welcome break from the Marvel universe.
The next TERMINATOR flick
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Re: The next TERMINATOR flick
I stopped watching after the third one, when it became apparent to me that the story engine of the first two Terminators -- Skynet sends a cyborg back in time to erase John Connor by killing his mother before he can be born -- leads to a narrative dead end the more they try to expand on it.
The problem (imo) is that once we know that Sarah Connor beats the Terminator(s) and ensures that future John Connor exists, there's not a lot of room to take the franchise, other than "here's another different Terminator trying to do the same thing as the last three that failed to kill Sarah." Young John might not be able to prevent Judgment Day from happening but it's equally pre-ordained that Skynet will never be able to kill Sarah Connor to keep him from being born.
Bold prediction: this new one will fail too and John Connor will still defeat Skynet in the future.
-
Re: The next TERMINATOR flick
Originally posted by JoeBanks View PostI stopped watching after the third one, when it became apparent to me that the story engine of the first two Terminators -- Skynet sends a cyborg back in time to erase John Connor by killing his mother before he can be born -- leads to a narrative dead end the more they try to expand on it.
The problem (imo) is that once we know that Sarah Connor beats the Terminator(s) and ensures that future John Connor exists, there's not a lot of room to take the franchise, other than "here's another different Terminator trying to do the same thing as the last three that failed to kill Sarah." Young John might not be able to prevent Judgment Day from happening but it's equally pre-ordained that Skynet will never be able to kill Sarah Connor to keep him from being born.
Bold prediction: this new one will fail too and John Connor will still defeat Skynet in the future.
Sarah Connor was only the target in the first one. Afterwards its was John Connor himself. And this time it's a young Mexican girl, apparently. But yeah, it's the same concept pretty much every time. Anyway, Linda and Arnold are back, so that alone will be exciting to a lot of people.
Comment
-
Re: The next TERMINATOR flick
it looks truly horrible. A recycling of catch phrases and characters.
look at the original T movie. There was Sarah Connor and there was Kyle Reece as principle speaking roles, Arnie "acted" but scarcely spoke. There were a few incidental characters - cops and so on and that was it.
Lean mean and stripped down; not huge bloated mess like this one looks to be.I heard the starting gun
sigpic
Comment
-
Re: The next TERMINATOR flick
Originally posted by Rantanplan View PostSarah Connor was only the target in the first one. Afterwards its was John Connor himself. And this time it's a young Mexican girl, apparently. But yeah, it's the same concept pretty much every time. Anyway, Linda and Arnold are back, so that alone will be exciting to a lot of people."Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy b/c you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say." -- Edward Snowden
Comment
-
Re: The next TERMINATOR flick
Schwarzenegger is supposed to play an aging version of the old T-800 that is now living amongst humans. Which defies logic, because exactly how does a Terminator age? Why wouldn't it just look the same? Makes no sense.
Anyway, you know when Linda Hamilton is delivering the "I'll be back" line that this series needs to be put to bed.
Comment
-
Re: The next TERMINATOR flick
Originally posted by JoeBanks View PostI stopped watching after the third one, when it became apparent to me that the story engine of the first two Terminators -- Skynet sends a cyborg back in time to erase John Connor by killing his mother before he can be born -- leads to a narrative dead end the more they try to expand on it.
The problem (imo) is that once we know that Sarah Connor beats the Terminator(s) and ensures that future John Connor exists, there's not a lot of room to take the franchise, other than "here's another different Terminator trying to do the same thing as the last three that failed to kill Sarah." Young John might not be able to prevent Judgment Day from happening but it's equally pre-ordained that Skynet will never be able to kill Sarah Connor to keep him from being born.
Bold prediction: this new one will fail too and John Connor will still defeat Skynet in the future.
Well, you're a writer. You write the damn thing.
Comment
-
Re: The next TERMINATOR flick
Originally posted by Southern_land View PostA recycling of catch phrases and characters.
Comment
-
Re: The next TERMINATOR flick
Originally posted by docgonzo;Which defies logic, because exactly how does a Terminator age? Why wouldn't it just look the same? Makes no sense.
*though thinking about it, surely skynet could have cloned some living human tissue around a box of really cool weapons rather than sending Arnie to the gun shop... And that folks is why I wanted to be a writerI heard the starting gun
sigpic
Comment
-
Re: The next TERMINATOR flick
Originally posted by Southern_land View Post*though thinking about it, surely skynet could have cloned some living human tissue around a box of really cool weapons rather than sending Arnie to the gun shop... And that folks is why I wanted to be a writer
* I think that was SECONDARY OBJECTIVES from Dark Horse comics, art by the amazeballs Paul Gulacy.
Comment
Comment