Another "we see" question - seriously

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: Another "we see" question - seriously

    Originally posted by instant_karma View Post
    Someone should write a screenwriting book just about the use of 'we don't see'.


    Maybe call it Save Schrödinger's Cat!
    In the movie the role of Schrödinger's Cat will be played by the Cheshire Cat. )
    "I am the story itself; its source, its voice, its music."
    - Clive Barker, Galilee

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: Another "we see" question - seriously

      Originally posted by JeffLowell View Post
      Yeah, I was wrong about that. TBB isn't allowed to. Everyone else can.
      I'll comply. But I also must stop using "we see". It's a yin yang thing.
      "I am the story itself; its source, its voice, its music."
      - Clive Barker, Galilee

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: Another "we see" question - seriously

        mac's post is cool. looking at what cameron, oedekerk and goldman wrote, it's clear they have a good visual eye to what the reader will expect to see (assumptions like bdz pointed out); so (imho) they are making it clear in the writing that the reader won't in fact see those things for a reason. great find.
        life happens
        despite a few cracked pots-
        and random sunlight

        Comment

        Working...
        X