Click here for Done Deal Pro home page

Done Deal Pro Home Page

Loading

Go Back   Done Deal Pro Forums > About the Craft > Screenwriting
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2010, 05:54 AM   #111
NikeeGoddess
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,211
Default Re: Fatal Flaw?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac H. View Post
I can see why they are all stories told by a point of view character narrating.

But where is the argument that the POV character/narrator is the 'main' character?

Surely 'main' character isn't necessarily the one narrating. If you someone what the movie 'The Castle' is about, they aren't going to say it's about a kid who doesn't do much - but has a father involved in a court case to save the house.

You'll say the film is about a guy going to court to save his house. The fact it's narrated/POV is from a kid doesn't make the kid the main character.

They would say the main character is the guy the story is about.

The narrator doesn't need to be the main character.

Mac
no, i said the storyteller is the protagonist, not the main character. in my examples the protagonist is telling a story about how the main character changed him or her life forever.*
this doesn't apply to every single movie. most times the main character and the protagonist are the same person. i was just showing that sometimes they're not.

*in shawshank - redd talks about how he spent so many years inside that he didn't think he could survive in the real world. remember when the first old guy got released and hung himself? redd thought he was on that same path but andy's desire to get out of that prison even after 17 years inspired him to survive out there. that's why redd is the protagonist and andy is the main character.

*mockingbird was a coming of age story. the story of the main character (atticus) was told by the protagonist (scout) and she was telling us how her greatness of her father changed her life forever.
NikeeGoddess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 06:32 AM   #112
JeffLowell
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,941
Default Re: Fatal Flaw?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPlkn...=youtube_gdata
JeffLowell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 07:01 AM   #113
NikeeGoddess
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,211
Default Re: Fatal Flaw?

damn it, janet... i mean, jeff. we didn't know you could sing.
NikeeGoddess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 08:03 AM   #114
bioprofessor
Member
 
bioprofessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,177
Default Re: Fatal Flaw?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NikeeGoddess View Post
no, i said the storyteller is the protagonist, not the main character. in my examples the protagonist is telling a story about how the main character changed him or her life forever.*
this doesn't apply to every single movie. most times the main character and the protagonist are the same person. i was just showing that sometimes they're not.

*in shawshank - redd talks about how he spent so many years inside that he didn't think he could survive in the real world. remember when the first old guy got released and hung himself? redd thought he was on that same path but andy's desire to get out of that prison even after 17 years inspired him to survive out there. that's why redd is the protagonist and andy is the main character.

*mockingbird was a coming of age story. the story of the main character (atticus) was told by the protagonist (scout) and she was telling us how her greatness of her father changed her life forever.
Same goes for Stand by Me, where the narrator, Richard Dryefuss, is the reflective adult of one of the geeky, trio of misfits (can't remember the character's name).
__________________
DDP Forums GoFundMe Campaign
It's yours to save or lose.
bioprofessor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 08:32 AM   #115
asjah8
Member
 
asjah8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,302
Default Re: Fatal Flaw?

sorry folks, i just don't see the connection. ex., shawshank: red's character switches back and forth from first-person narrative to third-person limited; ie, "when i met andy" -- "andy knew he had to do it, but the warden would retaliate" (or similar words). it doesn't make red the protagonist, he's just relaying the events as he knew them to be.

third-person limited is a fundamentally flawed pov unless the writer establishes ethos for the narrator; ie red's backstory information). in this case, i believe darabont cleverly wrapped ethos with pathos in order to draw the most identification from the audience. the magic of the literary tricks are hidden but they are there behind the scenes.

Last edited by asjah8 : 03-31-2010 at 08:48 AM.
asjah8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 09:10 AM   #116
billmarq
Administrator
 
billmarq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West of Arizona
Posts: 1,098
Default Re: Fatal Flaw?

May I be permitted to state the obvious? Is it not possible to over-analyze a movie, especially when we attempt to make the story fit into a formula? Some of the best films are those that don't fit a standard outline, like Psycho, in which the main character changes mid-story.

In a lesser movie, perhaps, should we be forced to decide whether Starsky or Hutch is the protaganist just so we can fill in a blank?

Standard outlines and formulae are great devices for a writer to use when constructing a story, but sometimes we need to deviate a little, and when we do the story may become more interesting or even meaningful.

In the above mentioned movie, I have to believe that Rick is the protag. That doesn't mean that Laszlo didn't help move the story along by his actions.

Now let's talk about Magnolia.
__________________
We're making a movie here, not a film! - Kit Ramsey
billmarq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 10:28 AM   #117
JimHull
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 28
Default Re: Fatal Flaw?

No, I would never do that...

My apologies to those who think I've tarnished the image of DoneDealPro. I didn't come in here to piss people off or offer an invitation to the Flat Earth society. The OP expressed concern that his story had a fatal flaw and pointed to one of my articles as a point of reference. He was then told that the problem was that his Main Character was not the Protagonist which by now you should know, I don't think is always that necessary.

For those who think I'm nuts for proposing that Lazlo is the Protagonist I know where you are coming from, and I would have thought the same ten, maybe fifteen years ago. I by no means think he is the Main Character! The film is obviously about Rick, it his story, and it is his emotional journey we are on.

But I do believe there is value in understanding the difference between the character who drives the efforts towards the goal and the character through whose eyes we witness the film.

I'm sure everyone would agree that the ending of "Casablanca" is a triumphant ending. The good guys win and the Main Character, though perhaps a bit remorseful at losing the girl, is in a better place. We see the end results of his efforts as being a good thing. He had a bad attitude in the beginning, and he overcame it. On the other side, the good guys win and the bad guys lose. This is the definition of a triumphant ending.

If Rick was the Protagonist, and by that I mean the character who drives the efforts towards the goal, then I think for the film to have the same sort of ending Rick would have ended up with Ilsa. Thankfully for us lovers of great stories that didn't happen!

There is a larger problem going on in the story of "Casablanca" that everyone is dealing with -- the resistance (good guys) vs. everyone's favorite bad guys the Nazis (bad guys). From this perspective, the bar owner, the french resistance fighter, the chief of police, the bartender, and so on - all these characters display the relative value between doing what is best for themselves (self-interest) vs. doing what is best for others (self-sacrifice). Note that I avoided using proper names -- this is essential when looking at a story from a purely objective view.

Internally, and more personally to the audience, we have that same struggle going on with Rick and Ilsa. This is a more subjective view into the problems presented in the story. I propose that it is the juxtaposition between the two different views that makes this film so great.

By combining both views it is offering us something that we cannot get in real life -- the chance to step outside of ourselves and look at what goes on from a purely objective view.

This is why stories are so wonderful and so important and why we keep going back to them over and over again - because they offer us something we don't get in real life: meaning.
JimHull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 10:37 AM   #118
instant_karma
Member
 
instant_karma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,365
Default Re: Fatal Flaw?

Quote:
Originally Posted by billmarq View Post
May I be permitted to state the obvious? Is it not possible to over-analyze a movie, especially when we attempt to make the story fit into a formula?
Absofrickenlutely.

I have serious doubts that any of the writers involved with Casablanca in either it's film or stage form were thinking in terms of Laszlo being the protagonist of the resistance movement story.
__________________
"Only nothing is impossible."
Grant Morrison
instant_karma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 11:47 AM   #119
Ronaldinho
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,270
Default Re: Fatal Flaw?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimHull View Post
LOL, nice one dmizzo - The problems in "Casablanca" exist because there are two letters of transit that have gone missing. Letters of transit that Lazlo was going to use to get to America. Everyone wants those letters, but it is Lazlo who is driving the pursuit towards them (both because he is in Casablanca and because he wants them for his own self-interest). Strasser is actively trying to prevent that from happening (Antagonist). Once Lazlo gets those letters, the problems in the story are resolved and the film is over.
Here's the problem:

Laszlo's story involves much more than the letters of transit. He's not in Casablanca because of the Letters of Transit. He's not even initially in Rick's cafe because of the LoTs.

The story is about how the LoTs intersect with, and mix up, RICK's life, not Laszlo's. This is actually probably the least cinematically interesting bit of Laszlo's journey to freedom, if you think about it.
Ronaldinho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 11:52 AM   #120
TwoBrad Bradley
Member
 
TwoBrad Bradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,028
Default Re: Fatal Flaw?

Every major (perhaps even some minor) character in a movie is the protagonist of their own story.
__________________
"I am the story itself; its source, its voice, its music."
- Clive Barker, Galilee
TwoBrad Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Done Deal Pro

eXTReMe Tracker