Nicholl 2016

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Nicholl 2016

    Originally posted by Terri View Post
    Like how one of my scripts got a 4 on BL...
    BL?

    Edit: Oh, Black List (I guess) -- sorry, I was thinking it was a judging criteria.
    "I just couldn't live in a world without me."

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Nicholl 2016

      Congrats to all who made it. My Western got one positive score but not high enough to get a third read.

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Nicholl 2016

        Made the top 15% but didn't qualify, still, well pleased.

        First feature script I ever wrote (and finished).

        Already started on next years entry.

        Good luck to all who got through and thanks Nichol.
        Genius sees everything.
        Genius sees.

        Posey Mund.

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Nicholl 2016

          If you made a "top %" is that stated in the email?

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Nicholl 2016

            Originally posted by Terri View Post
            If you made a "top %" is that stated in the email?

            It was in mine and somebody on the reddit sub posted that they made top 20%.
            Genius sees everything.
            Genius sees.

            Posey Mund.

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Nicholl 2016

              JESSE'S GOLD - quarter-finalist.
              We gain our innocence by taking yours.

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Nicholl 2016

                Congrats to the quarter final gang, go win it. Mine only made it to the top 15%. Bummer.
                Eric
                www.scriptreadguaranteed.com

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Nicholl 2016

                  Congrats to the Q-Finalists!!!!! Good luck in the coming rounds.


                  -----

                  I got the "top 10%" and "fell short of advancing to the quarterfinals by two-to-six points."

                  Mine said it was read three times -- how many points are possible to gain per each read? 100 or so per read? It doesn't matter, I'm just thinking out loud.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Nicholl 2016

                    Congrats to all who advanced to the quarter finals. My entry fell just short and was in the top 10%. For me, this is progress, though, as I was top 15% last year. At least I'm going in the right direction.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Nicholl 2016

                      My writing partner and I made it to the Quarterfinals (second time for me; first for him). Congrats to all the others advancing!

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Nicholl 2016

                        Congrats, all! Onward and upward!

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Nicholl 2016

                          Top 10% for Gargoyle, gutted to not quite make QF but still pretty happy.

                          Congrats to everybody who placed, and to all those who entered in the first place. Looking forward to seeing more success from DDPers!!

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: Nicholl 2016

                            Originally posted by Terri View Post
                            If you made a "top %" is that stated in the email?
                            It is. There are nine different groupings spread across the emails.

                            Quarterfinalist
                            Next 100 scripts
                            Top 10%
                            Top 15%
                            Top 20%
                            Two positive scores
                            One high score (generating a third read)
                            One positive score
                            (no mention of position)

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Nicholl 2016

                              I'm guessing that I'm missing some previously provided information on this point but ... why September (as opposed to now) to get comments for those not advancing? ... Not a big deal of course, but just wondering...

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Nicholl 2016

                                Originally posted by Dingo_Pug View Post
                                I'm guessing that I'm missing some previously provided information on this point but ... why September (as opposed to now) to get comments for those not advancing? ... Not a big deal of course, but just wondering...
                                Main reason is that the competition is continuing and we wait until all the quarterfinal reads have been added in. We also don't have the ability to separate the comments into groups for advancing and not advancing (you would think that would be simple, but nothing has been simple about the construction of our SQL database).

                                Plus we have a ton of stuff to deal with right now - end of first round, beginning of quarters, emailing of notifications, gathering semifinal judges, responding to reactions about first round notifications. Adding responding to reactions about reader comments would be rather overwhelming.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X