|
|
|
09-06-2005, 09:18 AM
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 789
|
Re: Lew Hunter's *Screenwriting 434*
Never read any Lew Hunter so can't judge him in particular, but is the reason why he and others like him publish their own scripts as example because they have the rights to them, and not to the really good scripts?
|
|
|
|
09-06-2005, 12:47 PM
|
#12 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 322
|
Re: Lew Hunter's *Screenwriting 434*
I've read 434. I took from it what I thought was helpful advice, and it gave me some things to consider. And that's all I can say about it.
As for why he inserts examples from his scripts and not others--I'm not sure. Field and Hauge had examples from well known scripts, as well as McKee. |
|
|
|
|
09-06-2005, 12:55 PM
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,993
|
Re: Lew Hunter's *Screenwriting 434*
Because it was the highest rated mow EVER! Or at least in 1992.
Okay, I have a soft spot for Lew. If you haven't got a clue what you are doing, or why, there are parts of 101 that make real sense. The script example is utter pants. The guy is not a good writer, but neither is Mckee. |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
