![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 490
|
Just netflixed "Next" with Nicholas Cage and Julianne Moore.
Complete and utter dreck. Vague Euro-badguys with some amorphous plan to blow up a bomb. Crappy action. Inconsistent rules of Nic's "ability" to see into the future. And to top it all off, a new variant of the "it was all a dream" ending (which may or may not have been in the original story, but certainly was crapola in the movie). And don't even get me started on Nic's hairdo. Please, if you can - run right out and miss this film. AC
__________________
"I've got vision up the butt, so just go with it!" - Dewey Finn, School of Rock |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 205
|
Didn't watch the movie, but read the screenplay. I liked the first third or half of it, didn't enjoy the rest.
__________________
Jesus, if this guy owned a funeral parlor nobody would die! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
At least reading the script, you didn't have to look at Cage's hair. ![]()
__________________
"I've got vision up the butt, so just go with it!" - Dewey Finn, School of Rock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,708
|
I'm always a sucker for a bit of Nic Cage, but I don't think I'll bother with this one - or National Treasure.
This film seemed like a poor man's De Ja Vu'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,289
|
just watched Lord Of War tonight -- what did you think of that one? Personally, I thought there was way too much voiceover in it and could have had more dynamic action scenes
__________________
"you have to write right, right?" -- Todd Gordon |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,086
|
I couldn't get past the hair, either.
However, I think the movie did do one thing remarkably well: exploit the concept. They really did exploit that time thingee from every angle - I thought there was something to be learned from that, at least. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: studio city
Posts: 5,541
|
The story is nothing at all like the movie (which I haven't seen - but it's about post nuclear war mutants, including a man with golden skin who can see a couple of minutes into the future... didn't get any of the from the trailer).
- Bill |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,172
|
Quote:
It had a good to excellent set up, with an exciting scene in a casino demonstrating Cage's ability to see two minutes into the future. He then somewhat inexplicably steals a car, but the preceding was so good I was willing to stick around to see if there was an explanation. As he's hiding from the authorities, the FBI (Julianna Moore) swoop in on him and explain that they need him to help them defuse a potential nuclear attack on L.A. Great. So I'm expecting an exciting second act in which Cage (reluctantly at first) assists the FBI in saving the west coast. But what does our protagonist do? He takes off running and starts stalking Jessica Biel! Why? Because apparently he can see farther into the future with her. Who cares! This isn't exactly a passive protagonist, it's more a case of a protagonist gone AWOL from the movie he's in! Instead of fighting the good fight against the terrorists, he's out trying to bang Jessica Biel. So the movie then becomes the FBI chasing after Cage so they can get him to help them save LA. In fact, Moore is more of a protagonist than Cage is, she is actively seeking a goal that is germane to the drama and stakes. And then the bad guys, for some reason, are also aware of Cage's abilities and they're after him too. By this time I'd completely lost interest. The entire Jessica Biel sequence is unbelievable as pointed out, she would never have gone with this loony dude in the first place and slept with him in a seedy motel. And regarding Cage's hair -- on another site I saw it described this way -- he borrowed Tom Hanks' hairdo from the DaVinci Code. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,517
|
While the movie has serious script problems, some dodgy CGI, a bad Cage hairdo, and doesn't live up to the concept, I still found it very watchable and much better than the horrible reviews.
And as opposed to the Sid Field fanboys on here, I thought that the non-traditional protagonist and his unwillingness to help "for the greater good" kind of refreshing. Why does everyone have to be a cookie-cutter boy scout? This guy just wanted to be left alone and get some Jessica Biel action - what's so weird about that? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|