![]() |
|
|
#141 |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 60
|
I just have to chime in here... for those that think receiving notes or feedback is a measure of the quality of the contest (and I'm not talking about Nicholls or TrackingB here)...
Sometime ago, I responded to two ads looking for contest readers... One contest that provides "notes" as part of the entry fee, pays their readers $10 for the notes and a "scorecard" on each script... I passed... but it really opened MY eyes... The other contest paid $25... still not enough to make me consider the job... and with this particular contest you paid for notes in addition to the entry fee. How much time do you think a "reader" is spending analyzing, critiquing, or even reading your SP when they're only getting $10 (or even $25)? How knowledgeable do you think the readers are who are willing to work for that $10? |
|
|
|
|
|
#142 |
|
Director
Nicholl Fellowships Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 669
|
Since comparisons have been made about entry fees, I'll offer a guess about the average fee paid by TrackingB and Nicholl entrants.
TrackingB has a three-tiered fee system - $70, $80 and $95. There is also an option of guaranteed representation at a management company for an additional $25 fee. Given the way entries arrive at Nicholl and at other competitions and figuring that about 1/3 of entrants select the extra fee, my estimate is that the average TrackingB entry fee would be close to $95. Nicholl has a two-tiered fee system - $35 and $52 in 2012. Based on prior years, my estimate is that the average Nicholl entry fee will be close to $47. (As Nicholl expenses were mentioned earlier, I wanted to provide a clarification. My estimate is that the average $47 entry fee will not cover our 2012 reading costs. Fellowships awards (now $35,000 each), travel, hotel and awards ceremony, administration and staff, database and website development and support - all of this will be above the entry fee revenue. Essentially, the endowment provided by the Mrs. Nicholl covers the fellowship awards; the Academy covers all other expenses.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 293
|
Let's be honest. Top 40 and top 10 are two very different things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#144 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 293
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#145 | |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 360
|
Quote:
Look at the advanced script pages forum right here at DDP. You can assess someone's skill set pretty fast. Put aside $2.50 a week starting right now and you'll have the money to enter trackingb. If your script isn't great, don't enter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146 | |||||
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,267
|
Quote:
Quote:
And even if, by soem strange happenstance, all great scripts made it to the top, paying a lousy $65 to cut out 10 years of grind is well worth it. Unless you're from some tiny island where $65 is a year's wage, I do not understand where you are coming from. Quote:
Quote:
Feedback services have ruined scripts that were just fine but they felt qulaified to comment and who also felt they had to give developmentnotes in order to justify the money you dropped. Let me run this by you again: you are quite happy to pay someone - usually with no influence or credentials - for notes and end up with your script no firther down the line but you are reluctant to pay that same amountof money to someone who, if they like your work, will hand you over to the big boys in Hollywood. Most of all - if you feel your work needs development notes then what the hell are you doing entering TrackingB, Nicholl or any other top tier competition?!?!?!? You just invalidated your entire stance by saying this! Quote:
I don't know what anyone likes - nor do these guys when they send in their demos to the music labels. And you are being both preposterous and crazy to want to know the exact details. Even if they listed the judges, how do you knwo which one reads your script? or what mood he was in when he read it? Did he get a great BJ that morning or did she stop just at the crucial moment? You can't over analyse this stuff and the fact that you are is proof (to me, anyway) that you clearly aren't ready. You have to believe that your script rocks and is pro quality, regardless of genre, regardless of reader, regardless of whether he got a great BJ that morning or not. If you are that good of a singer or a band and you think you can rock the music industry then you won't care which professional A&R guy listens to your stuff. You won't care at all. You'll just *know* you're better than 99.9% of the competition and that the industry is crying out for better than 99.9% of what's out there, trying to make it. Last edited by SundownInRetreat : 02-21-2012 at 10:18 AM. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#147 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 293
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#148 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: VanCity
Posts: 788
|
Quote:
Quote:
I can't do this thread anymore. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#149 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 293
|
The difference here is you're paying a fee to enter. It is not a cold query. What's the problem with a more transparent process and why are you against it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#150 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 146
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|