I read some scripts where suddenly there is a visitor standing at the front/back door of someone's house... Although, the introduction of the process is never revealed, I was wondering, compared to the lines below, a line from "Mr. and Mrs. Smith" and one which I am trying to figure out, on my own script. What is best to make the point clear?
First, the lines from "Mr. and Mrs. Smith" (Simon Kinberg)
They lean in a nice lingering kiss.
INT. SMITH HOUSE - FRONT HALL - LATE NIGHT
The door opens on Suzy and Martin Coleman, in their night-clothes. Flanked by two RENT-A-COPS.
John and Jane are wearing their post-coital attire. Hair wild. Eyes calm. They have a blised-out after-sex vibe.
SUZY
Is everything okay? We heard an
awful ruckus.
Suzy tires to peek in the house, get a glimpse of the destruction inside.
JOHN
Oh, we were just watching TV.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
So, as we can see there wasn't a door bell chime, or a knock at the door, they suddenly appear. However, we know before they did this, there was some distrubance going on inside. Are we to assume in the way the script was written that the purpose of us seeing the Coleman's ring the door bell was just a bit too much? In other words, I saw this example and my script is dfferent, but is it important to have the door bell or knock being told in the script?
Take a look.
//////////////////////
JESSICA
He wont. I'll take that.
Jessica takes the glass from her.
And there's a knock at the kitchen's back door.
INT. KUBRICK MANOR - KITCHEN - DAY
The door opens to see Melanie, standing in her white business suit. Jessica invites her in.
WE CUT TO JARVIS
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
I have introduced Melanie as driving up into the driveway and getting out of her car, and Rachel and Jessica taking over the kitchen's sink about Jarvis. It's when Melanie knocks on the door, where they confront.
Is the purpose of Melanie knocking important to keep, or like in "Mr.& Mrs. Smith" to just assume that she knocked on the door? Even though I explained she (has) arrived in the driveway and walking to the house?
I am open to kind suggestions on which method is okay, best, or not correct to use?
First, the lines from "Mr. and Mrs. Smith" (Simon Kinberg)
They lean in a nice lingering kiss.
INT. SMITH HOUSE - FRONT HALL - LATE NIGHT
The door opens on Suzy and Martin Coleman, in their night-clothes. Flanked by two RENT-A-COPS.
John and Jane are wearing their post-coital attire. Hair wild. Eyes calm. They have a blised-out after-sex vibe.
SUZY
Is everything okay? We heard an
awful ruckus.
Suzy tires to peek in the house, get a glimpse of the destruction inside.
JOHN
Oh, we were just watching TV.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
So, as we can see there wasn't a door bell chime, or a knock at the door, they suddenly appear. However, we know before they did this, there was some distrubance going on inside. Are we to assume in the way the script was written that the purpose of us seeing the Coleman's ring the door bell was just a bit too much? In other words, I saw this example and my script is dfferent, but is it important to have the door bell or knock being told in the script?
Take a look.
//////////////////////
JESSICA
He wont. I'll take that.
Jessica takes the glass from her.
And there's a knock at the kitchen's back door.
INT. KUBRICK MANOR - KITCHEN - DAY
The door opens to see Melanie, standing in her white business suit. Jessica invites her in.
WE CUT TO JARVIS
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
I have introduced Melanie as driving up into the driveway and getting out of her car, and Rachel and Jessica taking over the kitchen's sink about Jarvis. It's when Melanie knocks on the door, where they confront.
Is the purpose of Melanie knocking important to keep, or like in "Mr.& Mrs. Smith" to just assume that she knocked on the door? Even though I explained she (has) arrived in the driveway and walking to the house?
I am open to kind suggestions on which method is okay, best, or not correct to use?
Comment