MOst books and sites suggest that agents hate voice overs and will automatically dismiss a script if it starts off with one. Is this an exaggeration?
Voice Overs
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
it really is. the conventional "wisdom" is that a voiceover is a lazy way of telling a story when really you should be showing the story.
however, a lot of great movies have voiceovers, and voiceovers can be great. sometimes, new writers tend to use voiceovers as a crutch, and that is what you should avoid, and not the use of voiceoevers altogether.
cheers
-
The next voice you hear...
It's a very conditional thing. Most movies I've seen recently that use voiceovers obviously do so to fill in for faulty storytelling in the film proper.
On the other hand, there are genres and story types in which tightly-controlled narration can be a credit. I'm thinking of film noir/hardboiled detective films, or reminisces such as Stand By Me. Maybe a fantasy or historical flick, which presents itself as a dramatization of a particular record or chronicle. And there's always The Princess Bride.
Nathan
Comment
-
Re: V.O.
Voice over can be very effectively used to express the protagonist's assessment or opinion of a person, place or thing -- the "internal dialog."
The best example I can think of is Dances With Wolves, where the V.O. keeps the audience apprised of Kevin Costner's current level of understanding of the Indian culture.
Comment
-
question???
Is it okay or do you use voice overs, for a telephone conversation?
scenerio, I have a man speaking into a cellularphone with a loyal associate, but I do not want him to be shown just his voice to be heard, to add some type of wonder, so to speak:
MAN
Dialogue.
ASSOCIATE (V.O.)
Dialogue
^^^^ Is that correct? Can someone tell me what is? Thanx...
Comment
-
Re: question???
A phone conversation doesn't really constitute the kind of voice over people are talking about here. That's real time dialogue where one of the people is just off screen, like talking to someone in another room.
The "dreaded voice over" is things like having a shot of a family eating dinner and then voice over saying "This is my family. They're nice but loud. Look at my little brother. What a pig" etc.
Personally I thinl VO is one of the unique tools of film and if you can do it well and it is an essential part of the story you should do it.
Comment
-
Re: question???
Steve,
lol!
You hit the tone of bad VOs perfectly. Ouch. I've seen scenes like that with that type of VO. That's all I saw, though. Just that one scene.
Someone mentioned the VO's in American Beauty. Now, that's completely different. That's more a 'Guess what I'm thinking now' VO. Those are much easier to take because you hardly realize it is a VO. It's so much more internal.
AG
Seattle
Comment
-
Re: Okay
The bad voice over:
A man approaches an expensive mansion. Gold trim and lawn decorations are abound.
MAN (V.O.)
There's some gratuitous over-indulgence.
***Here, we gather the obvious VO before he says it. Show rather than tell, yadda yadda.
The not-bad voice over:
A man's boss stands in front of his desk. He's a portly man and looks like he's been afraid for most of his life.
BOSS
I'm going to need you to go ahead and reconcile these bank statements. Start with the last previous year and roll it forward to the present...
The boss' voice trails. The man studies him.
MAN (V.O.)
I found myself wondering what this guy would look like screwing a sheep.
**Like someone above said it's the "here's what I'm thinking" convention -- you couldn't have possibly known what the disgruntled employee was thinking unless he opened his mouth. Now, that doesn't necessarily make this little chunk of drivel enlightening or worthwhile... but you get the point.
Comment
Comment