Hello all.
First off all, i woul like to say that i'm glad to join these forums. I'm Portuguese and since my 19/20 i started to become really interested in screenwriting. Im here to learn from all of you and to become better.
Ok, now lets get down to business
I've bought Dara Marks book "Inside Story" (i'm sure many of you know it) to have a better understanding of how important and meaningful characters are in a story, how to make a strong emotional connection trough them, and also about plot structure. I've learned a lot already. Even though i dont dominate English very well, i find it easy to read.
At some point in the book Dara Marks say that a story normally have 3 plotlines: "A" is the plot, "B" is the internal conflict and character flaw, "C" is the relationship subplot. So one plot and two subplots.
She then explains it with movie examples. In "Casablanca", Rick's "A" story is to save Laszlo from Germans, "B" story is to connect with others and "C" story is to learn to love again.
So by the Dara Mark's words, "A" can only be achieved by resolving the "B". But how does he resolve that inner conflict and connect with others? By a change demonstrated in a relationship to something or someone in the outer world. In this case, that relationship refers to his love for Ilsa. This is "C" story.
The same for "Lethal Weapon". In order to stop the drug cartel ("A" story), they both have to learn to trust live ("B" story) and this can only be possible if they connect with each other and form a team ("C" story).
I can understand this logic. "B" is achieved trough the "C". What i understand from this is that resolving "B" is only possible after achieving the "C".
But what confuses me is that in Dara Marks examples, sometimes is the resolution of "B" story that leads to the resolution of "C" story.
I admit that my head is spinning a bit around that and i would really like to know your opinions about these please. And i'm truly sorry for this giant post, i didn't really mean to make it this long.
First off all, i woul like to say that i'm glad to join these forums. I'm Portuguese and since my 19/20 i started to become really interested in screenwriting. Im here to learn from all of you and to become better.
Ok, now lets get down to business

I've bought Dara Marks book "Inside Story" (i'm sure many of you know it) to have a better understanding of how important and meaningful characters are in a story, how to make a strong emotional connection trough them, and also about plot structure. I've learned a lot already. Even though i dont dominate English very well, i find it easy to read.
At some point in the book Dara Marks say that a story normally have 3 plotlines: "A" is the plot, "B" is the internal conflict and character flaw, "C" is the relationship subplot. So one plot and two subplots.
She then explains it with movie examples. In "Casablanca", Rick's "A" story is to save Laszlo from Germans, "B" story is to connect with others and "C" story is to learn to love again.
So by the Dara Mark's words, "A" can only be achieved by resolving the "B". But how does he resolve that inner conflict and connect with others? By a change demonstrated in a relationship to something or someone in the outer world. In this case, that relationship refers to his love for Ilsa. This is "C" story.
The same for "Lethal Weapon". In order to stop the drug cartel ("A" story), they both have to learn to trust live ("B" story) and this can only be possible if they connect with each other and form a team ("C" story).
I can understand this logic. "B" is achieved trough the "C". What i understand from this is that resolving "B" is only possible after achieving the "C".
But what confuses me is that in Dara Marks examples, sometimes is the resolution of "B" story that leads to the resolution of "C" story.
I admit that my head is spinning a bit around that and i would really like to know your opinions about these please. And i'm truly sorry for this giant post, i didn't really mean to make it this long.
Comment