Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

[gregbeal]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

What's a "positive" score/read in the first round?

Scores at 60 or above are considered "positive."

[Manchester]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

Scores at 60 or above are considered "positive."

Thanks.

[anxt]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

And, Greg, what is a "strong" score? Or is that synonymous with a "high" score?

[gregbeal]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

And, Greg, what is a "strong" score? Or is that synonymous with a "high" score?

It takes one "high" score to qualify for a third read. It takes at least two "strong" scores to advance a script to the quarterfinals. Strong scores are a slightly larger group than high scores.

[BenJacoby]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

Hi Greg,

For all the awesome Academy member credits you posted on FB, I'm just curious what categories those credits fall in. Do you guys give any indication of that? I assume that would be a time-consuming task so we certainly understand if not...

[gregbeal]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

Hi Greg,

For all the awesome Academy member credits you posted on FB, I'm just curious what categories those credits fall in. Do you guys give any indication of that? I assume that would be a time-consuming task so we certainly understand if not...

We posted a follow-up this morning with a little more detail about Academy Branch members and judging. Currently, we don't disclose more than that.

Academy member semifinal round judging.

[acquaformosa]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

Just sharing my small success with using the "Nicholl Awards Quarterfinalist- email from Greg Beal with my contacts via email. DDers who are quarterfinalists have probably already thought of doing this so this is just FYI.
Sent 12 emails to contacts I have that had read work in the past (some from VPF). And receive 4 requests for the quarterfinalist script pretty quickly. Wasn't sure if anyone would be interested in a quarterfinalist script so was pretty happy with those quick responses back. "FYI - Nicholl Awards Notification- in the subject line seems to get their attention.

Just curious. Did you actually include the original or initial email from Greg and the Nicholl staff . . . or just craft your own fresh query email? It sounds like you might have just changed the subject line and then added your own personalized query . . . with relevant logline details, etc.

[Storytell]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

Sorry I didn't see this sooner.

I put the title of the script with '2014 Nicholl Award' in the subject line.

I used a short pitch with logline and reference to 'Nicholl email notification below.'

I used an shotened version of Greg's email notification with the Academy 'Oscar' logo at the top immediately after my name.

Hope this helps. I've gotten six requests so far for the script out of about two dozen queries.

Good luck!

[grumpywriter]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

Greg,

Regarding the judge's comments...

There's no way to find out (or request to know) who made the comment on your script, right? The one for mine was, um, quite flattering

[gregbeal]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

Greg,

Regarding the judge's comments...

There's no way to find out (or request to know) who made the comment on your script, right? The one for mine was, um, quite flattering

Yes, that's true. We don't reveal any reader's name.

[LateNightWriter]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

The comments are incredibly encouraging -- specific, informative, perceptive. The screenplays in this competition are read carefully.

So often feedback tells us what's not working. But it also helps to know what IS working, and what moves readers. I am so grateful that the Nicholl is taking this on. I know it's a huge task to edit and send out that many comments.

Bravo to Greg and his team!

Late Night Writer

[Howie428]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

I wasn't looking forward to receiving my comments, but one of them turned out to be unbelievably positive. So positive that if I posted it here, you'd all accuse me of making it up!

I'm feeling much better about just missing the QFs. This feedback confirms my suspicion that this one is the sort of twist script that some readers won't get, but there are readers out there who will come along for the ride.

Of course, hit and miss doesn't win you a popularity contest format like the Nicholl. But I've heard it suggested that those are the ones people get really excited about, if you can find the right person!

Thanks to Greg and his team for their extra effort.

[oddsoulpics]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

This feedback confirms my suspicion that this one is the sort of twist script that some readers won't get, but there are readers out there who will come along for the ride.

Pretty good summary of creative work in general. Even my script (which made the QF) had two wildly different opinions.

COMMENT 1

"A script that has everything going for it. The writer has created great characters and insightful dialogue. There's a mystery that resolves itself in a way that surprises and opens out the story. And the writer has managed to capture a sense of place and a "last days of summer" kind of tone that makes it that much more special.

The fourteen-year old lead and his friends spend a restless summer trying to unravel a crime. They're too young to see the real danger they're putting themselves in and the story escalates as they get closer and closer to the truth. The characters are all well-done:The lead and the responsibility he assumes; the beautiful girl next door and the story of a first romance; his friends who are all individuals and not types. The dialogue is very good and the teens sound like teens and the adults sound like adults talking to teens.

The writing is a pleasure to read. You feel like you've been to that quarry or at the cul-de-sac where the lead lives. The structure is interesting as it plays out and pays off in different ways than expected."


COMMENT 2

"The story just does not connect with me on an emotional level. The stakes just always feel so low.

For me, there was no spark of originality or creativity in this script. I feel like this is so low key that the town feels like any other small town. The characters don't do anything super exciting. It's technically good, but for me it just doesn't go the next step."

[justin]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

It's good to know that the Nicholl readers have so much enthusiasm, but most of the very positive comments are clearly over the top. I got a similarly glowing response to my submission which didn't even reach the quarterfinals - and which I have ruthlessly re-written because I recognised it wasn't nearly good enough even before the QF list came out. Comment 1 is a nice pat on the back, but comment 2 could help you see your script's shortcomings and bring it closer to something you can sell.

[Howie428]

Re: Academy Nicholl Fellowships - 2014 - Questions & Answers

It's good to know that the Nicholl readers have so much enthusiasm, but most of the very positive comments are clearly over the top. I got a similarly glowing response to my submission which didn't even reach the quarterfinals - and which I have ruthlessly re-written because I recognised it wasn't nearly good enough even before the QF list came out. Comment 1 is a nice pat on the back, but comment 2 could help you see your script's shortcomings and bring it closer to something you can sell.

I know what you mean, and typically I'm the first one to dwell on the negative. However, there's a tendency among us writers to dismiss the positives, even though they are the things that'll get people excited.

We need to refine and keep positive elements, and accept that sometimes trying to fix the negatives for everyone might dilute the experience for the people who are on board.

In the case of my comments, I'm not sure there's a way to fix the finale in a way that'll convert the second reader without weakening what the first reader liked. I'm figuring having a fan like the first reader is worth more than trying to please the second reader.

The comments I got were:

Comment 1:

This is far and away the most interesting and well-written script I've read in ages. The writing is concise and confident.

The characters are complex yet very leanly drawn. There's a sense of authenticity to their behavior, as well as their interactions.

The set-up is brisk and the pacing, tension and suspense continually ratcheted up throughout the story is a way that keeps us glued to the page.

All the choices here feel deliberate and designed to add up to a bigger picture. Description adds texture, contributes to the tone, and paints a vivid picture. The atmosphere of the town very clearly contributes to the story.

While I could tell that things were not as they seemed, the many final reveals are still surprising twists that make a big impact. This doesn't have quite the final "falling dominoes- effect as we look back over all the events of the story as the huge surprise reveals of classics like THE SIXTH SENSE and THE USUAL SUSPECTS, but that's about all that's missing here -- and it's not far off -- and that's impressive, as is this writer's ability.

This is one of those rare pieces of writing that, the more you think about it, the more levels you realize exist, the more profound the metaphor and the greater the resonance of this sophisticated examination of heaven, hell, faith, guilt, atheism and religion itself. With all that going on thematically, the piece never feels pedantic; indeed it's rivetingly entertaining.

###

Comment 2:

This script initially works well, with a lean writing style where "less is more" and sympathy for protagonist, momentum of individual scenes working together, and realism work together to create a whole that works. It eventually loses some of this momentum and ends up less a structured narrative with three interdependent acts than a buildup to a twist; while the script still technically works, it's a bit of a letdown given the skill previously on display. The characterization functional if not especially complex, and the dialogue is mostly story-supportive (for the light story) and realistic (within context of some of the unconventional cult member characters and the what's real/what isn't of the twist ending). The script's conclusion arguably misrepresents writer's skills and sells them short.

###