Nicholl 2019

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Nicholl 2019

    Greg Beal no longer in charge?

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Nicholl 2019

      He got fed up with this:

      Mountain of Work

      And retired a few years ago!

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Nicholl 2019

        Originally posted by JaGra View Post
        As for the type of scripts that do better in this contest,

        -female protagonist who struggles against an oppressive, male dominated society.
        -pro #metoo #timesup
        -may be kind of boring but speaks to important 'social issues' (liberal leaning)

        It didn't used to be this way befor the current Program Director Swicord took over. It used to be about screenwriting talent, now Swicord turned it into a social issues contest and she even states, screenwriting ability is not the number 1 criteria.

        The Nicholl website says for years submissions have been 70/30 male/female. But in recent years the winners have been 80/20 female/male. Most of the winning scripts are the types of movies that are 'socially important', but not the types of movies audiences line up to go see because they're awesome.

        I guarantee this years winners will be mostly female protagonist stories and most by female writers, tuning the fact of 70/30 male/female submissions upside down. They gets not a dime from me. I write stuff the masses actually want to see.
        You recite a lot of numbers and make some fairly sweeping statements, but I'd be curious to see this quote from Swicord if you have it at your fingertips. Otherwise, given that she's only been in charge for one year, that's quite an fast transformation.

        Regarding "in recent years the winners have been 80/20 female/male":
        I did a rather fast unscientific perusal of the winners since 2012 and the breakdown seemed to be more 50/50, including last year (Swicord's first year as director) where the total among the finalists was 6 men and 5 women (one team was a female/male writing partner) though the winners were: 3 women/2 men (for four scripts).

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Nicholl 2019

          Not sure exactly when Swicord took over for Gale Anne Hurd but Swicord was Chair in 2015
          https://www.oscars.org/news/screenwr...riting-secrets

          "...we're not even really seeking scripts. We're seeking interesting writers...people who may not have nailed screenwriting...-
          https://youtu.be/_v6ulCO9N-M

          There's longer version of video on Nicholl website, or at least there was. If they are more focused on writers who have something important to say than they are on the craft of screenwriting, why not make it an essay, or fiction writing contest?

          Well I'm not going to go back and forth with you on this especially since you didn't even do enough research on your own to know Swicord was the Chair for more than one year. Let's just see what happens this year. It's going to be #metoo up the wazooo.

          Originally posted by acquaformosa View Post
          You recite a lot of numbers and make some fairly sweeping statements, but I'd be curious to see this quote from Swicord if you have it at your fingertips. Otherwise, given that she's only been in charge for one year, that's quite an fast transformation.

          Regarding "in recent years the winners have been 80/20 female/male":
          I did a rather fast unscientific perusal of the winners since 2012 and the breakdown seemed to be more 50/50, including last year (Swicord's first year as director) where the total among the finalists was 6 men and 5 women (one team was a female/male writing partner) though the winners were: 3 women/2 men (for four scripts).

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Nicholl 2019

            Originally posted by JaGra View Post
            As for the type of scripts that do better in this contest,

            -female protagonist who struggles against an oppressive, male dominated society.
            -pro #metoo #timesup
            -may be kind of boring but speaks to important 'social issues' (liberal leaning)
            Do you have actual evidence of this? Because I've found people often spout out "facts" like these without performing any kind of actual analysis. We're all happy to see any numbers.

            Originally posted by JaGra View Post
            It didn't used to be this way befor the current Program Director Swicord took over. It used to be about screenwriting talent, now Swicord turned it into a social issues contest and she even states, screenwriting ability is not the number 1 criteria.

            Most of the winning scripts are the types of movies that are 'socially important', but not the types of movies audiences line up to go see because they're awesome.
            I watched the video link you provided. In it, Robin says that craft is indeed important; however, the most important thing to the Nicholl is not "perfection" in craft. She emphasizes three things the Nicholl is looking for: stories that are original, stories that are thought-provoking, and stories that "encompass the full spectrum of all human behavior" (direct quote).

            So, it appears that their criteria includes a mix of craft and powerful story (there is no reference to "social issues" in her speech). I'm pretty sure this has always been Nicholl's mission. And I don't see what's wrong with it, as a script could have all the craft in the world and still feel meaningless.

            There are a million screenwriting contests out there, many of which prioritize more commercial stories. You're free to enter those. You don't have to denigrate the Nicholl just because you don't agree with its mission.
            "I love being a writer. What I can't stand is the paperwork.-- Peter De Vries

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Nicholl 2019

              I did not denigrate Nicholl's position. I simply clarified that which is highly misleading. They are often billed as the best screenwriting contest, but in reality actual screenwriting craft is not their number 1 priority.

              They enjoy the false narrative of looking for the best screenwriters because it keeps them rated number 1 with lots of submission fees paid by people who have no chance because they wrote a comedy that may be highly entertaining but has zero chance because it's not about some important serious issues a la The Big Sick.

              In one year two finalist scripts were about the horrors of female circumscision. Two out of 7000 just happened to have the best screenwriting craft And oh by coincidence they're both about the same female social struggle issue? This is a blatant case of what's really going on. It's social importance over screenwriting craft by far, and they should market and advertise the contest that way to keep things above board and fair, and stop swindling the comedy, sci fi, action adventures writers out of their submission fees because they might not have added important issues to their already entertaining scripts.

              You're right I don't have to apply to Nicholl. As I said in my original post, they gets not a dime from me. But someone asked what types of scripts they're looking for. I answered honestly. Honesty is not denigration. All the numbers I alluded to in previous posts are there to be verified if you want to do the research yourself. If you think I'm going to go out of my way to provide everything to you on a silver platter, forget it. Especially since most of you would choose to believe the false narrative over the truth even in the face of evidence. Start with the 70/30 m/f submissions. You can find that on Nicholl website. Then you can ask why the make up of finalists and winners doesn't approach that ratio anymore?

              We'll see who was correct when this years list of finalists comes out. I got female protagonist scripts for the win and it won't be close.

              Originally posted by UpandComing View Post
              Do you have actual evidence of this? Because I've found people often spout out "facts" like these without performing any kind of actual analysis. We're all happy to see any numbers.



              I watched the video link you provided. In it, Robin says that craft is indeed important; however, the most important thing to the Nicholl is not "perfection" in craft. She emphasizes three things the Nicholl is looking for: stories that are original, stories that are thought-provoking, and stories that "encompass the full spectrum of all human behavior" (direct quote).

              So, it appears that their criteria includes a mix of craft and powerful story (there is no reference to "social issues" in her speech). I'm pretty sure this has always been Nicholl's mission. And I don't see what's wrong with it, as a script could have all the craft in the world and still feel meaningless.

              There are a million screenwriting contests out there, many of which prioritize more commercial stories. You're free to enter those. You don't have to denigrate the Nicholl just because you don't agree with its mission.

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Nicholl 2019

                I expect that their judges' determinations are about story, first and foremost, whatever that story is. It is presumed and expected that any submission is reasonably close to the industry standard formatting. (They have their own famous little sample formatting script that can be followed: http://www.oscars.org/awards/nicholl/scriptsample.pdf)

                I know that they're not interested in Marvel/DC adaptations, or novel adaptations (unless it's your own I.P.). But anything else, if it adheres to formatting standards and is in English and is less than 140 pages, ought to be in contention.

                But, they are tough. You won't get a simple Die Hard clone past 'em.
                Last edited by catcon; 04-15-2019, 03:56 PM.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: Nicholl 2019

                  Since "facts" have been provided by several posters, let me state a few as well as a few of my own opinions:

                  I retired in January 2018. At that time Joan Wai took over my position as the administrator of the Nicholl Fellowships program. Joan is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the program. Two other full-time employees complete the Nicholl department.

                  One disclaimer: since I have not been involved in the program since January of 2018, it is possible that things within the competition are no longer the same as they were.

                  Robin Swicord, a screenwriter and Academy Board member, is the chair of the Nicholl Committee. She was appointed chair in 2014.

                  The committee oversees the Nicholl program but is not involved in its day-to-day operations. The committee chair may lead discussions but decisions regarding the broad mission and direction of the program are made by the committee as a whole. The committee tends to meet twice a year. In concert with the chair, the staff program administrator sets the agenda for committee meetings.

                  In the past committee membership was limited to nine consecutive years; it may now be limited to six consecutive years. New members have been added to the committee in recent years to expand its total membership.

                  Since the program's initial year in 1986, the relationship between staff and chair and committee has shifted from time to time, with the committee taking more initiative in some years and much less in other years.

                  One way the committee has taken initiative is in the revising of reader judging criteria. This has occurred several times over the past 30-plus years, most recently several years ago. Here's a link to the competition page. Click on Judging Criteria to see the current guidelines.

                  While the number of finalists has typically been at or below 10, the committee voted several years ago to allow the number of finalists to rise to as high as 15. This, of course, meant that the committee would have to read more scripts as part of the finalist evaluation process.

                  By my count from 2014 through 2018, fellowships have been awarded to 16 females and 11 males. During the same period, Nicholl finalists, including fellows, numbered 27 females and 34 males.

                  To compare to an earlier period, again by my count: from 2004 through 2008, fellowships were awarded to five females and 26 males. Nicholl finalists, including fellows, numbered 15 females and 43 males.

                  While the percentage of female/male quarterfinalists and semifinalists have relatively closely mirrored the percentage of female/male entrants over the years (within a percentage point or two on either side of 70% male to 30% female), the gender percentage split among finalists and fellows has varied greatly from year to year. Considering all 33 previous years of the competition, though, the gender percentage of fellows and finalists is much closer to that of entrants.

                  While I administered the competition, the committee often discussed what they were looking for. The point that I always stressed, both to individuals when they asked and to the committee, was that the Nicholl Fellowships is a best screenwriter competition, not a best screenplay competition, even though screenplays had to be used to identify the best screenwriters.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: Nicholl 2019

                    Originally posted by gregbeal View Post
                    ...

                    While I administered the competition, the committee often discussed what they were looking for. The point that I always stressed, both to individuals when they asked and to the committee, was that the Nicholl Fellowships is a best screenwriter competition, not a best screenplay competition, even though screenplays had to be used to identify the best screenwriters.
                    Thank you for chiming in here. Although I understand this sentiment, it is maddeningly frustrating because how can there be a discrepancy between best screenplay and best screenwriter?

                    What else are they measuring to create the discrepancy? It is my belief, based on Swicord's passionate description of real writing, that the thing that they are measuring to create the discrepancy is 'importance' of subject matter, which is based more on the judges' socio-political belief system to determine what is a meaningful story and what is not. It neglects to focus on the execution of screenwriting ability, the screenplay itself.

                    For some people, writing a comedy that makes people laugh is a meaningful story because genuine laughter is love and there's a lack of it in the world. And those writers also need help getting their careers started. And are being unfairly excluded as potential winners, but ain't nobody refunding their entrance fees even though they have virtually no shot of winning.

                    The way Swicord describes deep, meaningful writing, it seems like the contest should be for essays and fiction writers, not screenwriters. There's something special about screenwriting that differentiates it from all other forms of writing. It's all in the execution and by not placing screenwriting craft as the number one factor determining the winners, the contest is actually overlooking that which is special and unique about screenwriting. If any of these writers go on to work in the industry they'll learn right away it's all about the screenplay, not the importance of subject matter.

                    I think it would be good if the Nicholl went back to the beginning and welcomed stage plays and other types of writing since they're playing so much of a priority on deep, meaningful writing over the craft of screenwriting. If Nicholl is advertising itself as a screenwriting contest, then actual execution of the screenplay needs to be the number 1 criteria so that the contest is not misleading fee-paying entrants.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: Nicholl 2019

                      Originally posted by JaGra View Post

                      I think it would be good if the Nicholl went back to the beginning and welcomed stage plays and other types of writing since they’re playing so much of a priority on deep, meaningful writing over the craft of screenwriting.
                      JaGra, all you have to do is enter some other contest that's right for you. The type that doesn't care about "deep and meaningful writing," if you find that offensive. Or the kind that don't let girls win, apparently. I mean, come on, dude.

                      ETA: lots of contests have their own leaning. Isn't it Industry where most of the winners and runners-up are thrillers or action? Would you say the same thing to them? Complain that their winners should be Oscar-bait films? Because if not, you don't really have a leg to stand on here.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: Nicholl 2019

                        As I'm saying now for the third time. Nicholl gets not a dime from me. What you're really saying is it bothers you when I speak the truth. If it's not true, why does it bother you enough to respond? All you have to do is ignore this post and respond to one that doesn't offend you. You called me dude as if you know for a fact that I self identify as male?

                        The reason I responded to answer what Nicholl looks for is because my conscience won't allow me to sit by complicit while I can see the truth of what's going on even though most cannot. I cannot abide fraudulent behavior. You can't run an open contest making people think they have a fair chance to win, when in reality it's a stacked deck. Nicholl can do what they want with their contest but if they are misleading or dishonest about it, people who can see through the false narrative will be there to speak up. Whether or not other people choose to listen is totally up to them.

                        My comments aren't going to change the way Nicholl runs it's contest, so ask yourself why you are so bothered by my comments?

                        Originally posted by figment View Post
                        JaGra, all you have to do is enter some other contest that's right for you. The type that doesn't care about "deep and meaningful writing," if you find that offensive. Or the kind that don't let girls win, apparently. I mean, come on, dude.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: Nicholl 2019

                          Originally posted by JaGra View Post
                          I did not denigrate Nicholl’s position. I simply clarified that which is highly misleading. They are often billed as the best screenwriting contest, but in reality actual screenwriting craft is not their number 1 priority.

                          They enjoy the false narrative of looking for the best screenwriters because it keeps them rated number 1 with lots of submission fees paid by people who have no chance because they wrote a comedy that may be highly entertaining but has zero chance because it’s not about some important serious issues a la The Big Sick.
                          Nicholl doesn't tout itself as the "best" anything. It is touted by others as the best screenwriting contest for getting your foot in the door in the industry. And it still is, as its winners (and many finalists) are read by every shop in town, and many go on to get repped. Nicholl does say it is looking for the best screenwriters, but I don't recall the Nicholl ever positioning itself as looking for the best screenwriter purely in terms of craft -- so your whole "false narrative" argument makes no sense. If you can find evidence of that, feel free to provide it.

                          Originally posted by JaGra View Post
                          In one year two finalist scripts were about the horrors of female circumscision. Two out of 7000 just happened to have the best screenwriting craft And oh by coincidence they’re both about the same female social struggle issue? This is a blatant case of what’s really going on. It’s social importance over screenwriting craft by far, and they should market and advertise the contest that way to keep things above board and fair, and stop swindling the comedy, sci fi, action adventures writers out of their submission fees because they might not have added important issues to their already entertaining scripts.
                          It's silly to cherry-pick one year and try to use that as representative of what the competition is all about. Anyone can pick a year that had scripts with similar themes, but all you are doing is making a generalization. If you can indeed show a pattern of "social issues" scripts dominating over several years, then your argument would actually carry weight instead of coming off as a bitter rant. As I said before, Robin made it clear in her speech that the competition is looking for a combination of craft and a powerful story (not necessarily focused on social issues).

                          Originally posted by JaGra View Post
                          But someone asked what types of scripts they’re looking for. I answered honestly. Honesty is not denigration.
                          You didn't answer "honestly." "Honestly" would mean an answer based on a proven fact. Instead, you answered with a generalization based on your perception by saying that Nicholl is looking for this:

                          -female protagonist who struggles against an oppressive, male dominated society.
                          -pro #metoo #timesup
                          -may be kind of boring but speaks to important ‘social issues’ (liberal leaning)

                          Again, you have provided no evidence whatsoever to back up this assertion.

                          May there have been more female protagonists in winning scripts in recent years than in the past? Sure! But it doesn't mean that all of those female scripts are about women who "struggle against an oppressive, male dominated society." Where the hell did you get that from?

                          And what do you mean that a bunch of scripts have been "pro#metoo #timesup"? Have you read a bunch of winners with such a message? Or did you just pull that out of your ***, as it appears?

                          And how would you know if a bunch of the winning scripts are "liberal leaning" unless you actually read them yourself?

                          Originally posted by JaGra View Post
                          All the numbers I alluded to in previous posts are there to be verified if you want to do the research yourself. If you think I’m going to go out of my way to provide everything to you on a silver platter, forget it. Especially since most of you would choose to believe the false narrative over the truth even in the face of evidence. Start with the 70/30 m/f submissions. You can find that on Nicholl website. Then you can ask why the make up of finalists and winners doesn’t approach that ratio anymore?

                          We’ll see who was correct when this years list of finalists comes out. I got female protagonist scripts for the win and it won’t be close.
                          You seem to be really bothered by a higher number of female winners. But that outcome in itself is not necessarily proof of an agenda. It could just be that women have been producing better or more unique work in recent years. It doesn't matter if more men still submit than women; quantity doesn't automatically equate to quality.
                          "I love being a writer. What I can't stand is the paperwork.-- Peter De Vries

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: Nicholl 2019

                            Originally posted by JaGra View Post

                            The reason I responded to answer what Nicholl looks for is because my conscience won’t allow me to sit by complicit while I can see the truth of what’s going on even though most cannot. I cannot abide fraudulent behavior. You can’t run an open contest making people think they have a fair chance to win, when in reality it’s a stacked deck.
                            But... it's no secret whatsoever the types of scripts Nicholl picks. They freely list their winners' loglines for all to read, year after year, thereby giving potential entrants a very big clue as to what types of scripts they're looking for.

                            So I'm confused as to why you think they're committing some type of fraud -- your word, not mine.

                            But whatever. Good luck!

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: Nicholl 2019

                              Originally posted by figment View Post
                              But... it's no secret whatsoever the types of scripts Nicholl picks. They freely list their winners' loglines for all to read, year after year, thereby giving potential entrants a very big clue as to what types of scripts they're looking for.

                              So I'm confused as to why you think they're committing some type of fraud -- your word, not mine.

                              But whatever. Good luck!
                              This. Writers need to do their own research on whether or not Nicholl the right contest for them to enter. If they don't, that's really on them. Obviously JaGra was smart enough to figure this out and has determined Nicholl is not the right for him/her. Others should do likewise.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: Nicholl 2019

                                Wouldn't it be awesome if Nicholl had genre categories like some of the other contests?

                                Since they have up to five winners, how about one fellowship winner in each category?

                                For example,

                                -Action Adventure/Sci Fi
                                -Drama
                                -Crime/Thriller/suspense
                                -Comedy/Romantic Comedy
                                -Diversity/Underrepresented

                                one can dream. I'll be sure to do it that way when I open the JaGra screenwriting fellowship.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X