Re: Period talk
Right, and remember that 16th century French sounds very different from that spoken today. It can be both incredibly vulgar or very formal, depending on your characters' class. Rabelais could write scabrous stuff in the vernacular, and then you look at Montaigne, and though it's conversational in nature, it's still within a more formal frame. French today is in the same predicament. It's ruled by the Academie Française, of course, notably hidebound and resistant to, say anglicisms such as "le weekend" or the ubiquitous "OK" heard on most young French people's lips.
Watch the film "The Return of Martin Guerre" (based on a true story and a scholarly book by Natalie Zemon Davis, highly recommended) to see how it was handled, suze.
And the answer to the question about Bush and horses, is that horses avoid him because they're only too well acquainted with horsesh1t.
Right, and remember that 16th century French sounds very different from that spoken today. It can be both incredibly vulgar or very formal, depending on your characters' class. Rabelais could write scabrous stuff in the vernacular, and then you look at Montaigne, and though it's conversational in nature, it's still within a more formal frame. French today is in the same predicament. It's ruled by the Academie Française, of course, notably hidebound and resistant to, say anglicisms such as "le weekend" or the ubiquitous "OK" heard on most young French people's lips.
Watch the film "The Return of Martin Guerre" (based on a true story and a scholarly book by Natalie Zemon Davis, highly recommended) to see how it was handled, suze.
And the answer to the question about Bush and horses, is that horses avoid him because they're only too well acquainted with horsesh1t.
Comment