Re: Legal question re Expert Witness
Huh?
That makes no sense - it directly contradicts the whole point of double jeopardy.
The person being charged isn't obliged to produce lots of evidence against himself (or herself).
The prosecution can't get a retrial on someone who was found not-guilty just because they've worked a bit harder this time and found some extra evidence they didn't locate the first time.
Mac
Originally posted by LolaMoon
View Post
That makes no sense - it directly contradicts the whole point of double jeopardy.
The person being charged isn't obliged to produce lots of evidence against himself (or herself).
The prosecution can't get a retrial on someone who was found not-guilty just because they've worked a bit harder this time and found some extra evidence they didn't locate the first time.
Mac
Comment