2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

    I'm hoping someone can make some recommendations that prove me wrong here, but taking a look over my IMDB lists 2009 has been the pits for horror.

    So far I have seen four good to great horror films from 2009. MARTYRS and THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT represent the most base and sadistic side of the genre. They're both excellent films but I like to think of my horror horizons as a bit broader than 'torture porn'. ANTICHRIST is an art picture with some gore in it that barely qualifies as a 'cabin in the woods' film. ZOMBIELAND is a comedy with zombies in it, as opposed to a comedy/horror like SHAUN OF THE DEAD.

    Then there are a few middlers. PARANORMAL ACTIVITY was mildly effective for me on first viewing and remarkable with regards to the filmmaker's thrift, but so ephemeral that I'd never actually watch it again. I also enjoyed HALLOWEEN 2, the cinematography in particular, but I can by no means call it a good movie, and am not going to argue with you if you think it belongs in the 'terrible' pile. I enjoyed the sci-fi aspects of PANDORUM, but found the horror aspects slightly retarded. I wasn't blown away by TRICK 'R' TREAT but at least I have another option on Halloween now besides, well, HALLOWEEN. I liked the western aspects of THE BURROWERS, but the horror aspects not so much.

    I've watched a lot of other bad horror movies this year based on warm critical reception. I do not understand the hype for DRAG ME TO HELL, a contrived and silly THINNER-esque gypsy curse story with too much slapstick CGI crap and none of the bite of Raimi's early work. FRIDAY THE 13TH makes Jason Voorhees a pot farmer and manages to tick everything off the Jason checklist except the sense of cheesy 80s fun. ORPHAN presents a cartoonishly evil child with none of the nuance of say, JOSHUA, and then explains why she's so thoroughly evil with a ridiculous twist. HOUSE OF THE DEVIL is boring as hell and makes no sense. Which is one quality of many forgotten 80s horror movies that it emulates so well, so congrats for succeeding at failing. THE HAUNTING IN CONNECTICUT is a tired retread of every other haunted house story you've ever seen. THE HILLS RUN RED is standard DTV junk, and JENNIFER'S BODY is hamstrung by a half-baked concept and a script full of groaners that the actors can't handle.

    I didn't see everything. I have high expectations for FROZEN, [REC]2, Romero's new zombie flick, and BAD BIOLOGY. I've heard good word of mouth for THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE but the plot synopsis makes me want to vomit. I have not yet seen DEAD SNOW or GRACE. I had no interest in THE UNBORN, THE FINAL DESTINATION, SAW 6, MY BLOODY VALENTINE 3D, THE UNINVITED, THE STEPFATHER, THE FOURTH KIND, SORORITY ROW, etc etc etc.

    Help me out people! I need more weight at the top of the list. What have I missed? My ear isn't close enough to the ground to pick up on some of the sleeper stuff.

  • #2
    Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

    I heard THE FOURTH KIND was scary...


































    ... from my grandmother. so I dont know.
    Originally posted by Great White Mark
    Film is art? Just a tip, it's called show business, not show art.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

      I loved The Last House On The Left and Drag Me To Hell. Two very solid genre offerings in a time where it's a big deal to find just one a year.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

        [FONT='Calibri','sans-serif']My movie (wrote/produced/directed), FROM A PLACE OF DARKNESS pulled in some pretty good reviews. John Savage got the Best Supporting Actor "Golden Claw" award at the Terror Film Festival. [/FONT]
        [FONT='Calibri','sans-serif'][/FONT]
        [FONT='Calibri','sans-serif']Dread Central[/FONT]

        Killer Reviews

        Rogue Cinema

        You can rent it through NetFlix... or buy it at Amazon.

        Please let me know what you think. Best wishes for a Happy and prosperous New Year!

        Thanks,

        Doug

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

          Sorry about all the wierd stuff in the last post.

          Doug

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

            What's funny is being the "Rom Com" guy in these parts...

            I saw almost every one of these horror pics. Go figure.

            I think we have to distinguish between mainstream horror, foreign horror and fringe horror in discussions like this.

            Why?

            Because different films made in different systems are going to have different sensibilities... And cater to different audiences.

            For example, all the mainstream studio horror offerings... Drag Me To Hell, Jennifer's Body, Unborn, Final Destination, The Haunting in Connecticut, etc... Are more or less PG-13 offerings not intended to be "real" horror.

            Sure, some even have a R-Rating, but the content isn't anywhere near something like Last House on the Left, or Friday The 13th, Halloween 2, etc. To me, movies like these are a separate category because these are intended for a different audience than the mainstream PG-13 "horror" crowd.

            Then we have stuff like "Antichrist", "Centipede" and others that are not only made outside the U.S... But they are like Gwi Lo said: Art house Horror.

            My point is I don't think it is fair to lump all of it together and say, this year sucked for horror. I think we have to qualify that remark and define what our (own) criteria is for the kind of horror we might be partial to. Then we can say, well, as far as so-and-so horror goes, I thought X ruled, but Z drooled, etc.

            For instance, I like hardcore stuff like Last House... But I will see Final Destination and Drag Me to Hell, for the camp factor.
            Positive outcomes. Only.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

              WritersBlock -

              I don't discriminate within the genre, I'm into the whole shebang... unless we're talking about pure shock crap like those Guinea Pig movies or the ones that are structured like porn auditions with no plot at all. I don't care if it's sci-fi, torture porn, Sam Raimi spook-a-blasts or another damn slasher remake. If it's got a chance of being good I'll check it out. Fully realize DRAG ME TO HELL is not meant to be MARTYRS, but in the interests of a thorough round-up I just named whatever has horror elements in it.

              Put it this way, this was no 2007, when we had

              THE ORPHANAGE
              THE SIGNAL
              [REC]
              28 WEEKS LATER
              THE MIST
              GRINDHOUSE
              JOSHUA
              TEETH
              SUNSHINE

              Instead of the four I mentioned as my cream of the crop.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

                Some of my 2009 favs:

                Pontypool
                Zombieland
                Drag Me To Hell
                The Collector
                Thirst
                Let the Right One In
                Martyrs
                Dead Snow

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

                  Originally posted by Gillyflower Cooms View Post
                  Some of my 2009 favs:

                  Pontypool
                  Zombieland
                  Drag Me To Hell
                  The Collector
                  Thirst
                  Let the Right One In
                  Martyrs
                  Dead Snow
                  Ditto. Some great titles there. I also really dug THE ORPHAN and PANDORUM.
                  @TerranceMulloy

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

                    Gwai Lo:

                    You're right that in the general sense, they are all horror. That's not what I am saying.

                    You said there were not that many good horror movies this year. I agree... But then I present what I think might be a reason for that based on the fact it's *almost* an apples to organes comparison these days IMO given the different types of horror (who they target and who produces them e.g. Rob Zombie vs. Paramount Studios).

                    I mean, I liked Antichrist, but *I* don't think that is fair to compare it to something like Drag Me To Hell, or Jennifer's Body. The latter are not meant to be as hardcore as the former and this is because of who their target audience is and producers are...

                    And this is why it might not seem there are as many good horror movies this year depending on the kind of definitions we use.

                    Maybe I am discriminating a little, but I like to make sure if there are any notable differences within a genre that those are taken into account in a discussion like this because this might be a leading factor for certain conclusions.
                    Positive outcomes. Only.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

                      Zombieland could no more be considered horror than Disney's Cinderella.

                      I say this because I hate horror films (I frighten easily) but loved Zombieland. The only time that film made me jump was when the zombie appeared in the bathroom stall, and *shudders* the part with the zombie clown.

                      INT. PINEAPPLE - DAY


                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

                        Well you two kinda just made my point for me. It's a weak year when I have to include stuff like ANTICHRIST and ZOMBIELAND to beef up an otherwise two-entry list of what was good, a two-entry list that makes me look like a hound for torture-porn. Again to clarify I am not measuring ANTICHRIST against the same standard as JENNIFER'S BODY, the original intention was just to name whatever fell under the broad umbrella of horror and let the unwritten assumption be that the ratings apply to how successful each film is within its sub-genre and rating.

                        LET THE RIGHT ONE IN in PONTYPOOL were both 2008 releases for me. Forgot about THIRST, need to check that out, and I will also take a look at THE COLLECTOR.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

                          Originally posted by 12916studios View Post
                          Zombieland could no more be considered horror than Disney's Cinderella.

                          I say this because I hate horror films (I frighten easily) but loved Zombieland. The only time that film made me jump was when the zombie appeared in the bathroom stall, and *shudders* the part with the zombie clown.
                          You hate horror, but are writing a zombie script?

                          Not baggin' on you here, but good luck. I'm serious. But I think this right here sums up what I suspect about the genre (American version)... that most of what's been written lately seems to be by folks that don't particularly like the horror films. And it shows.
                          "Forget it, Jake. It's Hollywood."

                          My YouTube channel.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

                            Time to nut up, or shut up.
                            @TerranceMulloy

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: 2009 in HORROR: it was a pretty weak year.

                              Zombie films do not have to be scary in the "I must **** myself" sense. Zombieland proved that. Although the wiki definition of the horror genre includes the word "unsettling", which I suppose Zombieland was in some places.

                              Though I will inevitably have to brand my script as horror, I do not intend for it to be particularly scary, because that's never been the story I wanted to write. I am allowed to dislike a genre and still write something vaguely of it. I can write scary (or unsettling), but I just can't watch it.

                              INT. PINEAPPLE - DAY


                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X